Gopal Krishna Gokhale: The Moral Compass of Indian Politics

  

 This essay marks the first in a series dedicated to exploring the life, work, and enduring contributions of Gopal Krishna Gokhale, one of India’s most remarkable leaders. Often remembered simply as a “moderate,” Gokhale’s vision and actions transcended labels, shaping the political, social, and moral foundations of modern India.

In this series, I aim to delve deeply into his role in awakening political consciousness, promoting education, mentoring future leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, and advocating for justice both at home and abroad. Each subsequent essay will illuminate different facets of his legacy—from his economic and legislative work to his philosophical and ethical approach to politics—highlighting why Gokhale’s life remains profoundly relevant to understanding the evolution of the Indian National Movement.

Gopal Krishna Gokhale was perhaps the greatest leader that India has ever produced, and possibly her greatest man, as noted by The Statesman newspaper on February 21, 1915, a few months before his death. Rabindranath Tagore—great poet and conscience of the Indian National Movement—in a letter to Gokhale in December 1913, wrote, "You must remember that for a man like you to live is in itself a service to your country, for your life is not merely useful, it is a light to others." These tributes capture the unique combination of personal virtue and public commitment that defined Gokhale’s life.

His illustrious biographer, B.R. Nanda, opined that Gokhale owed his rise primarily to his own outstanding ability, industry, and public spirit. His ambition to excel in everything he attempted—whether a college examination, a magazine article, a public speech, or even a game of billiards—had turned him early in life into an assiduous student of politics. He was fortunate to serve his political apprenticeship under M. G. Ranade, who instructed him in the principles of humane, liberal, and secular nationalism and provided him with a thorough grounding in Indian politics and economics. Being Ranade’s protégé was an obvious asset that shaped Gokhale’s intellectual and moral framework.

What brought Gokhale close to the hearts of educated Indians was the clarity, conviction, and courage with which he not only criticized, condemned, and fought against British policies that further weakened Indian political life and economy, but also proposed and worked tirelessly in a constructive manner to consolidate the spirit of Indian nationalism.

Educated Indians admired not only his moderation, but the sharpness of his indictments of government policies. They were captivated by his ability to articulate their innermost thoughts and aspirations, and they saw in him an embodiment of personal sacrifice and a steadfast dedication to protecting the interests of the motherland—qualities they admired but could scarcely emulate.

 

Perhaps Gokhale should not be regarded merely as the greatest moderate leader, but as one of the greatest Indians of all time. He represented the national interest of the entire country under oppressive British rule, and in holding the British accountable for their exploitation, he spoke on behalf of even the most remote and unknown masses. Though they might never have known his name or recognized his services, he acted for them, voiced their concerns, and grieved for their plight.

As his biographer B.R. Nanda wrote in his biography Gokhale: The Indian Moderates and the British Raj, “Gopal Krishna Gokhale viewed politics not as the pursuit of power or influence on behalf of individuals or groups, but as a lever for the regeneration of his country. This idealistic conception of politics seemed to fit in with the needs of a subject race struggling to be free. It did not sound hypocritical when it was expounded by a man whose words never went beyond his teeth. Gokhale saw how well trained and organized the British bureaucracy in India was. He saw what little chance there was of challenging its monopoly of power without enlisting an equivalent measure of talent, training, and discipline in the nationalist ranks. This was why he set out to build a cadre of political missionaries through the Servants of India Society.”

The noble contribution of Gokhale becomes even more evident when one considers that he was bitterly opposed not only by the colonial bureaucracy and successive viceroys at every step, but also by his ideological opponents, the extremists. Their most important leader, Bal Gangadhar Tilak, often leveraged Gokhale’s moderate stance to his own advantage. Tilak repeatedly delivered rhetorical and emotional appeals in defense of orthodox Hindu beliefs, directly challenging the reformist views held by Gokhale and his mentor, Mahadev Govind Ranade. Often, the legal and constitutional methods sincerely followed by Ranade and Gokhale were considered treasonable and condemned repeatedly by extremist leaders as political mendicancy.

Nevertheless, Gokhale remained steadfast in his commitment to train future Indian national leaders, spread the light of patriotism among the educated Indian masses, and awaken them to the perils of British rule, urging them to look beyond mere clerical service under the colonial administration. Single-handedly, he held the British government accountable for their dangerous economic policies, exposing the systematic exploitation of Indian revenues for the benefit of the colonial power, the mother country.

 

Gokhale’s great contribution lay in his ability to oppose the oppressive policies of British rule without placing the blame entirely on the British. He saw colonial rule as an opportunity to democratize, modernize, and politically awaken Indian society. At the same time, he recognized the deep-seated ills within Indian society itself, which needed reform and correction in order to create a healthy, self-reliant nation worthy of self-rule.

There is a widespread misconception among students of history today that the moderates were hardly concerned with the interests of the masses. However, a careful reading of the speeches Gopal Krishna Gokhale delivered on the budgets presented annually in the Imperial Legislative Council reveals that he was a passionate advocate for free and compulsory primary education for the Indian masses.

Gokhale believed that without basic literacy, the masses could neither engage meaningfully in political activities nor be expected to show a healthy interest in public affairs. As a modern politician, he recognized the importance of legal and constitutional methods while also emphasizing the need to bring the masses into the political sphere at the earliest opportunity through education. This crucial task of politically awakening the people was later taken up and expanded by his illustrious disciple, Mahatma Gandhi.

Another often overlooked contribution of Gopal Krishna Gokhale was his role in supporting the struggle of Indians in South Africa for equal treatment. He worked to ensure that they were recognized for their right to practice the professions of their choice and to gain entry into all parts of the South African colonies. Through his guidance and advocacy, Gokhale sought to protect the legal and social rights of the Indian diaspora abroad.

In the same vein, Gokhale played a pivotal role in the life of his illustrious disciple, Mahatma Gandhi. He encouraged Gandhi to conclude his struggle in South Africa and return to India, recognizing that a larger and more urgent challenge awaited him at home.

Gokhale understood that India was entering a period of far greater political complexity and danger. By advising Gandhi to return, he prepared him to face heavier odds—not only from the British bureaucracy and colonial rulers, but also from the divided opinions and cautious approaches of Indian national leaders themselves. Gokhale’s foresight ensured that Gandhi would take up the mantle of leadership at a critical moment in India’s struggle for self-rule.

To quote again the words of his biographer B.R. Nanda,

“His lofty ideal of spiritualizing politics was practicable only in small groups. It enabled him to kindle the pure flame of patriotism in some of the finest young men and women who came under his spell. But it could not protect him against the savage assaults of his political opponents, or the calculated stratagems of the hard-headed guardians of the Raj. His faith in the virtues of rationality and moderation may have been admirable, but it was a fallible guide in a world largely swayed by irrationality and expedience.”

In conclusion, Gokhale’s life was marked by extraordinary dedication, foresight, and moral integrity. As his biographer B.R. Nanda observed, he would have suffered less if he had not thought of politics as a game to be played according to the rules of the best minister. He would have suffered less if he had possessed the stoicism of his master Ranade, the nonchalance of his rival Tilak, or the egotism of his eminent contemporary Pherozeshah Mehta. Indeed, no other Indian politician of the time, with the possible exception of Dadabhai Naoroji at the turn of the century, commanded such high prestige among the Indian elite outside his own province.

The enduring legacy and profound contributions of Gopal Krishna Gokhale merit our perpetual remembrance and rigorous study, far transcending the reductive label of "moderate." As a holistic nation-builder, he masterfully balanced incisive critiques of imperial exploitation with urgent calls for internal social reform—a vision that we must cherish as an eternal beacon for India's soul.

Summary:

Gopal Krishna Gokhale was one of India’s most remarkable leaders, celebrated for his combination of personal virtue and public commitment. The Statesman described him as perhaps India’s greatest man, while Rabindranath Tagore called him a light to others. Gokhale rose through his own exceptional ability, discipline, and public spirit, shaped profoundly by his political apprenticeship under M. G. Ranade, who instilled in him humane, liberal, and secular nationalist values. He earned the admiration of educated Indians for his clarity, courage, and sharp critique of British policies, while embodying personal sacrifice and steadfast dedication to the nation.

Gokhale’s political vision extended beyond moderation; he sought to awaken Indian society, promote education, and hold the British accountable for economic exploitation. He advocated free and compulsory primary education, mentored future leaders, and guided Mahatma Gandhi during his South African struggle. Gokhale also worked to ensure equal rights for Indians abroad, demonstrating a global vision of justice.

Despite opposition from colonial authorities and extremists like Tilak, Gokhale remained steadfast, combining rationality, ethical politics, and constructive reform. His life exemplifies dedication, foresight, and moral integrity, with a legacy that transcends the label of “moderate.” Through incisive critique, advocacy for social reform, and mentorship, Gokhale’s contributions continue to illuminate India’s political and moral path.

10 key takeaways about Gopal Krishna Gokhale:

  1. Connection with Educated Indians: Gokhale resonated deeply with the educated class in India.
  2. Clarity of Thought: His ideas and arguments were expressed with remarkable clarity.
  3. Conviction: He demonstrated firm belief in his principles and vision for India.
  4. Courage: Gokhale boldly criticized British policies despite potential personal and political risks.
  5. Critical of British Policies: He actively opposed policies that weakened India’s political structures and economy.
  6. Constructive Approach: Beyond criticism, he worked positively to strengthen Indian society and politics.
  7. Promotion of Nationalism: He sought to consolidate and nurture the spirit of Indian nationalism.
  8. Balanced Leadership: He combined intellectual rigor with practical action in public life.
  9. Inspirational Figure: His integrity and dedication inspired many Indians, especially the youth.
  10. Legacy of Reform: Gokhale’s work laid the foundation for future leaders, including Gandhi, influencing India’s path toward self-rule.


 

Comments